Who and how many you ask?

The above screen shot demonstrates only half of the many parties who were potentially cheated for the full amount agreed to for services rendered. The other 25% accepted a coerced negotiated reduced amount and the remaining 25% haven’t filed. Very few of them eventually collected and filed releases. Nonetheless this demonstrates a questionable business ethic.

Shortcomings to the buyer

1200, 1202 and 1204 Alisa Lane were intentionally eliminated from all continuous rigid insulation and therefore do not meet the minimum city energy code requirements of R-22 for the envelope. It was considered “overkill”. Good luck on your energy bills.

The retaining wall between GM Financial and any properties were not installed per civil engineered city approved drawings. Swales between properties were not surveyed at final grading. Who needs a pool when you have all that ponding.